The St. Albans Bank Heist

The St. Albans Bank Heist

Cops and Robbers

St. Albans Bank Heist
Captain's Blog

– Case Description

As the rain began to fall on an early autumn day in Queens, people on their lunch break opened umbrellas and ducked into doorways.  Three men stepped out of a car and took cover in the St. Albans branch of the Manhattan Bank. Once inside, it was clear that the men weren’t there just to get out of the rain.  Brandishing weapons with movements that meant business, the bandits proceeded to steal cash from the tellers and ordered the bank manager to the vault. 

They weren’t aware of the young clerk cowered in the back, surreptitiously reaching for the phone to call the police. The police arrived within five minutes but the bandits had already executed their plan and made off with thousands of dollars in cash. 

The case led to “Cowboy Pete’s” cache: a .45 calibre machine gun, a sawed off shotgun, a Winchester rifle, a 12 gauge automatic shotgun, four .45 Colt automatics, and 27 other revolvers in addition to large stores of ammunition, cartridge clips, blackjacks and burglars’ tools.

Crime Summary

The well-planned crime netted at least $7900 for the gang.  Nearly half of the loot was in rolled coins, which was used to pay an accomplice $1000 in dimes.

Charred coin wrappers in a chimney flue and a matchbook in the backseat of the getaway vehicle provided a trail of clues in the case.  Detectives were led across county lines to Manhattan, and over state lines from Pennsylvania, Dallas, Los Angeles and back.  Ultimately,  it was the leader’s penmanship that brought the case together.  By dotting his “i’s” with circles instead of dots,  he helped detectives make the necessary connections to the crime.

The bandits were captured within weeks of the robbery.  They all pled guilty at the trial and were each sentenced to varying prison terms of up to 25 years.

“Cowboy Pete” Colavecchio, a fugitive and gunman with an impressive arsenal was arrested in Manhattan two years later.

 

Final Result

Detective Gordon Hill and Captain Henry Flattery were commended by Commissioner Valentine for excellent police work in breaking the case.

Dollars Stolen

Bandits

Fences

Let’s Work Together

3 Boys Steal Police Pistol and Kill a Man

3 Boys Steal Police Pistol and Kill a Man

3 Boys Steal Gun, Kill Man

Lifted a Revolver from a Police Station

June, 1935

 

Captain's Blog

– Case Description

On a Saturday afternoon in June, three young boys took their shoe shine business to the local police station. It was a cop’s duty to have shiny shoes, and the hungry boys were looking to make money. What they found instead was an opportunity for trouble.

Two brothers, 11 and 13, along with their 13 year-old friend had weaseled their way in the Jamaica station when they stole a loaded police revolver from an officer’s coat. They used the gun in a failed holdup, and later that night, a murder.

The Crime

The boys used the pistol 3 times after they stole it from the police station. They brandished it once in a failed holdup, fired it once on a dare, and ultimately used it to shoot a man point blank when he refused to wake up from his drunken slumber. Twelve-year-old Frank shot William Walsh in the head and the boys left him for dead.  Walsh was found by a city worker the next morning, alive, but only hours from death.

The Punishment

While the victim’s widow wanted the boys to “go to the chair,” charges of murder against Frank Damato, 13 years old; Julius, 11, his brother and Lisbon Lawrence, 13, were dismissed after the grand jury refused to indict them.  The case was referred to the Queens Children’s Court.

Frank and his brother Julius were ordered to the New York Catholic Protectory in Westchester County,

Libson was sent to the New York State Training School at Warick.

Let’s Work Together

Rifle Gang Robbers

Rifle Gang Robbers

The Rifle Gang

Brazen Thieves Terrorize Brooklyn and Queens

1934 – 1936

Trial Summary

Aenean vulputate odio mauris, suscipit iaculis diam sodales ut. Pellentesque vitae massa vitae massa tempor auctor in a ante. Fusce id urna posuere, facilisis turpis non, imperdiet ligula. Ut rutrum euismod orci sit amet porttitor. Quisque nisl massa, rhoncus interdum consectetur vitae, pellentesque non neque. Vivamus et semper velit. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam ornare purus in turpis pharetra vestibulum.

Aenean eleifend, quam quis ullamcorper venenatis, lorem neque venenatis mauris, et aliquet risus quam quis urna. Praesent vitae elit ut mauris semper ultricies sed eu nisi. Etiam dictum orci in enim pretium, et egestas odio consequat. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nam venenatis, lectus quis tristique efficitur, quam eros interdum nunc, sit amet commodo lacus eros at ligula. Maecenas vel nunc gravida, pharetra turpis vel, placerat neque. Vivamus varius tellus at ante posuere.

Process

W

Curabitur arcu erat, accumsan id imperdiet et, porttitor at sem.

W

Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat.

W

Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui.

W

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus.

W

Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit.

Final Result

Aenean vulputate odio mauris, suscipit iaculis diam sodales ut. Pellentesque vitae massa vitae massa tempor auctor in a ante. Fusce id urna posuere, facilisis turpis non, imperdiet ligula. Ut rutrum euismod orci sit amet porttitor. Quisque nisl massa, rhoncus interdum consectetur vitae, pellentesque non neque. Vivamus et semper velit. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam ornare purus in turpis pharetra vestibulum.

Dollars Awarded

Day Trial

More Trials

Lorem vs. Ipusm

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

John Doe vs. Divi

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Jane Doe vs. Amet Site

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Ipsum vs. Consecteture

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Amet Sit vs. Divi

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Smith vs. Builder

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Lorem vs. Ipusm

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

John Doe vs. Divi

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Accumsan vs. Tincidunt

Ut efficitur condimentum mauris. Mauris in consequat mauris. Quisque non maximus ipsum a facilisis. Learn More

Let’s Work Together